Flock CEO Garrett Langley has said that the controversial surveillance company Will “immediately” cease partnering with any customer who abuses its systemsWhich also includes law enforcement agencies. However, he also claimed that Flock had yet to find any reason to do so, arguing that all incidents so far have been the fault of a few bad people within the organizations.
Judge rules an officer’s use of flash cameras was ‘unconstitutional’
But I am saying TechCrunch Disrupt On Wednesday, Langley attempted to address widespread concerns that Flock could facilitate mass surveillance and privacy violations. There have been numerous examples of US law enforcement officials abusing Flock’s system, using it to stalk, harass, and monitor people without reason. Although Flock has not canceled its partnerships with any customers, Langley believes such incidents were caused by individual actors within the organizations.
“Much of the debate focuses on ‘What if two of the 50 officers were caught?'” Langley said. “Today, we have not ejected any customers, but it is not off the table in case of some drastic law-compliance issue.”
According to public interest law firm Institute of JusticeThere have been more than 240 incidents of misuse of automated license plate readers like Flock by US law enforcement since 2021. Many cases involve surveillance of women or former partners by authorities.
Earlier this month, a US federal judge found an officer conducting a warrantless search of a driver unconstitutional after using Flock cameras to track his recent movements. Flock appeared to stand in favor of the officer’s use of his technology, with a spokesperson saying he expected the decision to be appealed and overturned.
mashable light speed
Flock CEO claims microphones detect gunfire, not sound
Langley also talked about Flock’s surveillance microphones and emphasized that their goal is to detect gunfire and not monitor people’s interactions. formerly known as ravenof herd Gunshot and Audio Detection System It is designed to recognize sounds from specific types of incidents, including shootings, street captures and car accidents. It can also differentiate between fireworks and gunshots, preventing false alarms. However, according to Langley, it cannot recognize human voices nor record them.
“We said, ‘Okay, great, it’ll just make gunshot noises, simple as that’.” Langley said, TechCrunch reports. “If the gun goes off, we will inform, and if not, that’s all we will hear.”
Although Langley said that Flock’s system only detects gunfire, a spokesperson later clarified to TechCrunch that this is only its primary focus, confirming that it also catches fireworks, street occupations, and vehicle accidents.
Flock advertised its gunshot and audio detection systems as being able to capture human screams and distress when it introduced the feature last year. later company removed this feature next Objections from privacy advocatesThose who expressed concern about Herd eavesdropping on every loud public conversation – a function that could enable mass surveillance.
“Gunshot detection is designed to recognize specific sound events, not people,” Flock wrote in an article. july blog post Announcing that he was removing the human screaming identity. “The system can’t understand speech, analyze language, or recognize voices. It doesn’t now, and it never has.”
according to the herdIts gunshot and audio detection system works by continuously analyzing ambient audio on the device in a three-second window. If there is nothing of interest the audio is not saved, but if there is a sound that matches what it is looking for, such as a gunshot or screeching tires, the system will record the audio and send an alert to the concerned parties.
Despite such assurances from Flock, widespread concerns remain about the implications of its systems for privacy and mass surveillance. Distrust of the company has led activists to stage protests, map camera locations, and even destroy Flock’s hardware.